eat less meat!

How preposterous of me to tell you so?  Not.  Surprisingly, this is a huge environmental issue that goes way beyond the potentially ethical question of killing (they call it harvesting now, to make it sound more harmless) a living being and eating it. Don't get me wrong, I'm not a vegetarian.  However, in the Western industrialized world meat consumption has skyrocketed from eating meat once a week or so to just under 200lbs/person/year in the US since the advent of cheap meat!  This enormous meat consumption in combination with the rise in world population and the increasing numbers of people able to afford the cheap meat has become a recipe for disaster.

The environmental calamity arises from "cheap" and "too much."  Why?  Because the CAFOs (concentrated animal feeding operations) that these poor animals are raised in are among the biggest greenhouse gas emitters on this planet - generating about 18% (!!!) of greenhouse gases.  In addition, the huge amounts of animal waste leach antibiotics into our ground water.  And to top it off, the conditions under which these sorry souls are being raised, then killed and processed are so horrendous that it is literally unbelievable (read Jonathan Safran Foer because you must know).

There is nothing necessarily wrong with eating meat per se.  As a matter of fact, especially during childhood and adolescence animal protein helps to grow the brain.   But like with anything balance is the key and industrialized nations have become meat addicted.   Food researcher and author Marion Nestlé has advocated eating meat in condiment quantities.

How can we help?  First and foremost by resisting to buy cheap supermarket meat, which comes from CAFOs.  Instead, buy your meat at or from a local farm where the animals have been raised sustainably.  Yes, it will cost more.  But we ought to consume much less of it!

It's in the quality, not the quantity.

You may also want to revisit a series of three posts on meat eating.

how big is your garbage can?

Actually, I should ask "How big is your recycling can?"  I am hoping your recycling can is bigger than your garbage can.  If so, you are on the right track.  If not, there is a lot you can do to reverse that. It is insane how much household waste we generate (and which has to be disposed of somehow).  In 2012 in the US we produced close to 251 million tons of garbage or 4.38 pounds per person per day!!!  That is 17.52 pounds per day for a family of four, or almost 6400 pounds per year!!!!  Holy mackerel.  And consider this:  household garbage only accounts for about 2% of all garbage generated, since there is also industrial, construction and commercial garbage.

No wonder we are collectively beginning to wake up to the need to generate less garbage, recycle more, consume less, make smaller packaging, and compost more.

DSC00316At our house we have the smallest garbage can available, a 35 gallon can, while our recycling can is huge, it takes 95 gallons.  I am a fervent recycler, as well as bottle (to the store to get my 5 cents back) and egg carton (I get my eggs from a farm) and plastic bag returner (to the supermarket collection bin for all sorts of plastic bags I somehow ended up with).  And even though I have temporarily stopped composting, we usually only generate about one full garbage bag (made of recyclable plastic) per week (sometimes two) for our family of four (and about half of that is produce and other compostable stuff).  Everything else gets recycled.

Moreover, recycling services are for free (or rather paid through your taxes), while you pay for your garbage pick-up by can size directly out of your pocket - the smaller your garbage can the less you pay.   And if you have a garden and can compost you'll end up with even less garbage.

So you can do something good for the environment and save money on top of that (although this goes beyond the mere money question since we pay a huge environmental price for every bit of irresponsibility).  Also refer to an earlier blog post about what else you can do.

 

 

bring your own bags

I have never liked the ubiquitous plastic shopping bags the supermarkets and other big box stores almost force on you.  They fly around parking lots on a windy day and end up in shrubs and trees as well as in our oceans (have you heard of the Pacific trash vortex?  what a mess!).  And even though I save those few I do inevitably end up with in my kitchen cabinet with the other recyclables I mostly have no use for them. People have become more aware in recent years for sure, what with all those bags made from recycled plastic bottles you can get at every supermarket (but they don't wash well).  In Europe it has always been customary to bring your own shopping bag, net or basket.  In more recent times plastic shopping bags, at least in Germany, have become so expensive to buy (they don't hand them out for free over there) that it has drastically curtailed the use of them.  California may soon become the first state in this country to ban this environmental scourge, as the NY Times reported a few days ago.

some of my bags

I use machine washable canvas shopping bags of which I bought a whole bunch many years ago, as well as a really neat bottle carrying bag (it fits nine bottles).  I usually have a few in my car, just in case.  Traditional woven shopping baskets are no longer very practical because they are bulky and you can't fit a lot into them.  Mesh shopping bags, on the other hand, fold up so small you can always carry one in your bag for unforeseen purchases.

We begin to become environmentally aware in baby steps.  This is one way to start.

way too much waste

  all this packaging came with a small plastic figure!

Have you ever thought about what happens with your waste once the garbage truck pulls away from your curb?  Out of sight, out of mind? The garbage statistics in this country are staggering even if we only consider residential garbage (a mere 2% of the total garbage output, which includes industrial, commercial and construction garbage).  San Francisco has striven for many years to become a zero waste city, trying to either recycle or compost most waste.

I do want to make you feel guilty in order to make you more aware.  After all, toxic landfill juice leaks into our groundwater (which we drink), and toxic landfill breath evaporates into our air (which we breathe in).

What can you do to help?  Many things.  First, recycle, recycle, recycle.  Get the biggest residential recycling can from your recycling company, and the smallest available garbage can from your garbage company (and save a few dollars a year).  Recycle all your paper products, from cereal boxes to newspapers to gift wrap.  If you get your eggs from a farm return your egg cartons to them for reuse.  If you do some home printing print on both sides of the paper.  Recycle all your plastics (the recycling company does not take bags in our area, but the local supermarkets collect them for recycling) and glass containers (I actually save a lot of my wide mouth glass jars to store home made hummus or bulk items I get from the coop).

Bring your own canvas shopping bags when you go shopping.  Start a composting bin if you have a garden and compost all produce waste (see an earlier post), coffee filters and tea leaves/bags, egg shells, stale bread (although I'd rather make bread pudding or a breakfast strata with it).  If you eat a lot of produce like we do, that should cut your kitchen garbage output by about half!

You might also consider buying clothes at second hand shops (I am always amazed what great things in superb condition I find at a fraction of the cost of new clothing), and give your used clothing (that is still in good condition) to a local shelter or bring it to the many clothing donation bins that abound.  And do buy compostable garbage bags since standard plastics can take up to 1000 years (!!!) to decompose.

Most of all, buy less stuff (stuff does not make you happy, inner peace does) and produce less garbage.  Please reread an earlier related post,

 

 

it's happening

In a way I'm an unscientific trend tracker and I think it's happening.  The NY Times declared on its front page today that "Industry Awakens to Threat of Climate Change."   Why is this headline a good thing?  Climate change is real, climate change is happening faster than we anticipated, climate change will have huge impacts worldwide on all fronts and for each of us personally (and moreso for our children), and the faster we jointly act on reversing the causes the less painful the effects will be in the long run (although all that carbon we are spewing into the atmosphere will stay around for at least 1000 years even if we reverse its continuous increase now).

Waking up and acting is what's required NOW.  And while we as individuals can make a big difference by opting for renewable electric energy sources, switching to LED lamps, putting solar panels on our houses, insulating our houses the most most most we possibly can, opting for double and triple pane windows, buying local and working local, just to name a few actions that have impact if practiced by lots of people (the effect is cumulative) - the real difference is when this thinking finally  bleeds into the commercial-industrial sector.  And that's what's happening - finally.  Read the article.  It is encouraging, even though the commercial-industrial sector is coming at it from the perspective of the bottom line as opposed to the eco perspective.  It's a start.

Also take a look at earlier related posts  "divorce is not an option" and  "The Great Transformation."

what the heck is kernza?

You might ask what the heck Kernza is?  It's about sustainable agriculture.   Sustainable means in short eternally renewable from within, which is without bringing in outside products.

We almost take for granted the annual winter seed buying ritual from seed catalogs.  But I always thought that buying those decorative annuals for the garden was a bit of a waste, compared to perennials that come up every year again, no worries, no money, no effort.  Wouldn't it be nice if our wheat came up every year again?  No buying seeds, no sowing, no tilling, less effort, less money.  Researchers have been working on exactly that: developing perennial varieties of our staple cereals, and Kernza is one of them.

This is thinking more in terms of permaculture (please read my previous post on it), a perennial polyculture, which is what most ecosystems look like as Mark Bittman explains in a recent article:  "In perennial polyculture, the plants may fertilize one another, physically support one another, ward off pests and diseases together, resist drought and flood, and survive even when one member suffers."  How does that sound for a wonderfully cooperative plant community?  No Darwin here.

You can start small in your own garden by saving seeds from this year's harvest for next year's planting instead of relying on the big seed companies; or look for a local seed library for some interesting heirloom varieties.  Local seed libraries  (see Hudson Valley Seed Library) work collaboratively and require you to bring back some of your own seeds to keep the library replenished.

Think in renewable cycles.

divorce is not an option

That's what Bill Clinton said about our interdependence with our planet in his keynote address at Omega Institute's recent conference on sustainability which I attended. We must all wake up to the fact that climate change is here and that it is real, that it is manmade, that it is happening fast, and that it is a scary thing.  As a matter of fact, Jeremy Rifkin, the writer and economic and social visionary actually called it "terrifying."

But then, out of crisis and chaos new things are born.  Environmentalist and entrepreneur Paul Hawken's message at that same conference was to embrace carbon, our supposed enemy.  "Carbon," he says, "is the business of life and the answer to our nightmares," the subject of a book he is currently writing, because carbon is "the currency of abundance," a concept we lack in our present interest based economics of scarcity (see also Charles Eisenstein's Sacred Economics).  Interesting, because spiritual traditions have always advised us to embrace our enemies who mirror back to us what we lack or need to embrace.

So, since divorce from our planet is not an option, and closing our eyes and ears just prolongs the agony, we each need to wake up - quick quick.  The break, or consciousness shift, that the Mayans may have seen in the ending of their calendar with the year 2012 is here.  Change is opportunity, and we choose how gently or how chaotic change happens.  Through embrace and acceptance change happens more gently.   Do your bit  -  we must get off carbon as an energy source and embrace it in other forms.  Get a Prius, insulate your home, realize that the world is changing, eat much less meat and not the supermarket kind, open up to your intuition, speak kindly to others, and most of all enjoy life!  That way "life does not come at you, it comes from you," as my wise yoga teacher Aura Lehrer said.

It's no longer business as usual!

Also see recent posts on what sustainability is and the conference notes.

The Great Transformation

Hold on to your seats ...then go with the flow.  The Germans are calling it "Die Große Veränderung," "The Great Transformation."  The shift is here, the consciousness shift (the Mayan calendar ending, 2012 et al.) that is driven by climate change.  Or we could say that climate change (which we created) is now accelerating our consciousness shift.  Oh well, they all inform each other reciprocally anyhow.

It is the Great Transformation to a cooperative, peer-to-peer (as Jeremy Rifkin, the economist, writer, public speaker, and consultant to the German government, says), lateral (no more from-the-top-down) culture and consciousness structure that will radically transform our approach to energy and its distribution, and with it to our culture at large.  And, Rifkin states, it will all happen within one generation!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (If we don't get off carbon in 30 years, he says, we are doomed, so we better go with the flow, and fast, than resist, because otherwise it'll be even more painful).  I do want to scare you a bit out of your slumber, as Rifkin did at this past week-end's conference on Sustainable Living, when he said about climate change that we are really not being told the seriousness and urgency of the issue here in the US - Germany, Denmark, as well as Costa Rica are on the forefront of all things climate and energy change.  Rifkin says about climate change "It's terrifying!"

So this consciousness transformation, that my book and blog are about, albeit from a slightly different twist (more about returning to a more balanced heart and spirit based way of living as a basis for healing from the inside out) is actually forcing itself on us from the environmental side.  And from there it will transform our economy from the bottom up, and with it our entire culture.  Out with scarcity based economics, in with an economy of abundance (see also Charles Eisenstein's Sacred Economics).   In importance this shift is bigger than the Fall of the Roman Empire, and it will happen faster and reverberate around the entire globe.

Cultural change here it comes!  The thing is - if you are an active participant it's an exciting opportunity to help create a new cultural paradigm; if you resist it (or even deny that climate change is happening) you will be dragged kicking and screaming along in the wave of change.  So, you choose - creative opportunity and empowerment vs. victimization.  We live during such a crucial, a bit scary (why is change scary?), yet such an incredibly momentous period in the history of humanity, let's make the most of it!

Also visit my previous post on the notes from the conference on Sustainable Living.